Legal Opinion

Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. Florence

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 30, 1970PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCutter, J.

Chelsea Industries, Inc. (Chelsea), seeks by this bill to enjoin Florence from competing with Raimond Silver Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Raimond), 1 which is wholly owned by Chelsea. The question arises under a written contract (the purchase contract), dated May 9,1968, to which the parties were Chelsea, Florence, and other vendors of Raimond stock. By final decree, the bill was dismissed. Chelsea appealed. There is a report of material facts. The evidence is reported.

Raimond is an “item house” selling metal and glass items to some 12,000 buyers for stores and others. There are only three or…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. My Bread Baking Co. v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
  2. Lamson & Co. v. AbramsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Mansfield v. LangMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Massa v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Chartrand v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Psy-Ed Corporation v. KLEIN HIRSCHMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Chase Commercial Corp. v. OwenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
  3. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Pritam SinghCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Gilmore v. Century Bank & Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  5. Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. Lafferty, Margret Rey v. Richard G.D. LaffertyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API