Legal Opinion

Psy-Ed Corporation v. KLEIN HIRSCH

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 12, 2011No. SJC-10722PublishedCited by 144 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

This case involves bitter litigation spanning more than a decade. It raises the question, among others, whether actions taken by an employer against a former employee may violate G. L. c. 15IB, § 4 (4) and (4A), sections of the anti-discrimination law that respectively prohibit retaliation and interference with a protected right. On this question, we conclude that an employer or other person may be liable to a former employee under these sections for retaliatory or interfering conduct that occurs after the employment relationship has terminated. We defer all discussion of the additional…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  5. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by144 opinions

  1. Weiler v. PortfolioScope, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  2. Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  3. Verdrager v. Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  5. Conformis, Inc. v. Aetna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023

139 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API