Acme Markets, Inc. v. Wharton Hardware & Supply Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SIMANDLE, District Judge:
The parties come before the court to dispute the validity of a restrictive covenant which purports to prevent the owners and lessees of land situated in Medford, New Jersey from operating a supermarket. Each party brought an action to protect its rights and the two actions have been consolidated. Presently, the court must address a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P., brought jointly by Acme Markets, Inc. and Jarnap Corporation.
I. BACKGROUND
Formerly, the properties at issue were part of a 111-acre farm owned by Donald M. Singer and his…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC v. Village Supermarkets, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Eichorn v. AT & T Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- In re Lamictal Indirect Purchaser & Antitrust Consumer LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.