Eichorn v. AT & T Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal from the grant of summary judgment we must decide whether defendants AT & T Corp., NCR Corp., Lucent Technologies, and Texas Pacific Group’s agreement to restrict the hiring of certain employees upon Lucent’s sale of Paradyne Corp. was a violation of § 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act. We also must decide whether this no-hire agreement which effectively cancelled the plaintiff employees’ AT & T pension bridging rights violated § 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. We hold the no-hire agreement was a valid covenant not to…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kurt H. Eichorn v. At&T CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- A&B Campbell Family LLC, et al. v. Williams Partners, L.P., et al.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- ALLIANCE CANCER SPECIALISTS, P.C. v. THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF ALLEGHENY COUNTYDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
- ASSOCIATED BUILDERS & CONTRACTORS OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. PLUM BOROUGHDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.