Legal Opinion

Bickham v. REYNOLDS ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

(Pro Tempore)

This action was brought by Constance Bickham, the plaintiff, a tenant in the apartment house owned by the defendants, asking damages for injuries sustained as the result of a fall on the back stairway of the leased premises. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants were negligent in failing to repair the stairway.

The defendants appeal from a jury verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $5,000.

At the close of plaintiff’s case the defendants moved for a nonsuit, and at the conclusion of the testimony, moved for a directed verdict. Both motions were denied.

On…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashmun v. NicholsOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Howard v. DoolittleThe Superior Court of New York City · 1854
  3. Lopez v. GukenbackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  4. Staples v. SendersOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Bailey v. First Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Baker v. State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  2. McWilliam v. Phillips Petroleum, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Schenk v. LampOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Brunk v. HortonOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Bell v. Bernard Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API