Brunk v. Horton
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GILLETTE, Justice Pro Tempore.
Plaintiff brought this action for damages for conversion of an automobile. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found for the plaintiff and defendants appeal. While defendants state four separate "assignments of error” in their brief, all involve the trial court’s denial of their motion for an involuntary nonsuit. ORS 18.230.
In reviewing the denial of a motion for involuntary nonsuit the evidence, including all reasonable inferences which may be drawn therefrom, is taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Bickham v. Reynolds, 224 Or 194, 355 P2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Mullins v. ROWE ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Williams v. International Harvester Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Remington v. LandoltOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- Chance v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beall Transport Equipment Co. v. Southern Pacific TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- City of Pendleton v. One 1998 Dodge Stratus 4 DoorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Sova v. Vital Auto Brokers, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021