Legal Opinion

Staples v. Senders

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1940PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

Numerous questions have been argued touching the liability of a landlord to an invitee of a tenant injured on the demised premises, and as to the construction and applicability of the ordinance pleaded and relied on by the plaintiff, none of which we find it necessary to discuss or decide, because we are of the opinion that if the defendant was guilty of any negligence, either under the common law or by reason of failure to comply with the ordinance, such negligence was not the proximate cause of the plaintiff’s injury.

If the ordinance be given the construction placed upon it by the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ring v. . City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Gibson v. HoppmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Eklof v. WaterstonOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Iudica v. DenezzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Whisler v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ritter v. BEALSOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. James v. Carnation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Fullerton v. LammOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  5. PETERS v. McKAYOregon Supreme Court · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API