Legal Opinion

Doyle v. City of Scranton

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 18, 1975No. Appeal, No. 382 C.D. 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

John J. Doyle began serving as a reserve patrolman in the Scranton Police Department on May 12, 1955 and he became a regular Policeman on October 1, 1961. In approving each of Doyle’s appointments, the Civil Service Commission waived the City’s maximum age requirement of 37 years, for Doyle was 48 years old at the time of his initial appointment in 1955. Doyle served continuously as a regular Policeman until February 22, 1973 by which time he had passed the age of 65, and his employment was then terminated pursuant to a City ordinance, enacted in 1968, which provided for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Allegheny County Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Boyle v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Soltis AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Wolkoff v. OwensCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Beynon v. SCRANTONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gardner v. BOROUGH OF SAYRE.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Mercier v. City of Central FallsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  3. Mercier v. City of Central FallsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API