Legal Opinion

Soltis Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 11, 1957No. Appeals, 228, 229, 280PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

On August 20, 1956, the Council of the City of Duquesne, a third class city, passed an ordinance effective December 31, 1956, requiring all city employees to retire and apply for pensions upon reaching age sixty-five. This ordinance affected three policemen in that city, namely, George Wallington, Frank Szalay and William Soltis. All three policemen filed a request for hearing upon being informed of their retirement. The city denied their request, as did the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County which sustained the city’s preliminary objections in the nature…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyle v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Gaul v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Schearer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Siani v. City of Wilkes-BarreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Seltzer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. McIlvaine v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Camaione v. Borough of LatrobeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Beynon v. SCRANTONSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Allen v. West Mifflin BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API