Legal Opinion

Wolkoff v. Owens

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 15, 1974No. Appeals Nos. 248 C.D. 1973 and 404 C.D. 1973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

This action in mandamus questions the propriety of the dismissal of the appellees from the Bureau of Police of the City of Scranton, allegedly made necessary by a lack of funds. At the time of the dismissal, all of the eleven appellees were full-time policemen on the Scranton force who were under 65 years of age, the compulsory retirement age, but who had served over 25 years and who therefore, upon their election, could retire with pension.1 The policemen were notified by letter dated January 14, 1972 from the Director of Public Safety and the Superintendent of Police…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cummings v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Gernert v. LINDSAYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Schneider v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. City of Scranton v. Leo LynnCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. RIZZO v. SchmanekCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Porter v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Balcrius v. HICKEYCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Bauer v. PetersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Doyle v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API