Legal Opinion

Ruggles v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 11, 1913PublishedCited by 41 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal Court of Baltimore City (Gob-tee, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Urner, J.,

delievered the opinion of the Court.

The Motor Vehicle Law of Maryland includes among its provisions the following-: “Eo person shall operate a motor vehicle upon any highway of this State until he shall have first obtained an operator’s license for the purpose, but nothing herein contained shall be taken to prevent the operation of a motor vehicle by an unlicensed person, other than a person whose application has been refused or whose license had been suspended or revoked, if accompanied by a licensed operator” * * * (Sec. 137, Chapter 207, Acts of 1910; p. 174, sec. 139, Art. 56,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Welton v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Stone v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Doyle v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FunkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Dasch v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  4. Kirwan v. the DiamondbackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Maryland Theatrical Corp. v. BrennanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API