Fannon v. Polo
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The primary issue in this appeal is whether the superior court correctly interpreted two property restrictions, one found in a subdivision declaration and the other in a deed's greenbelt covenant, to ultimately determine that the deed's greenbelt covenant is enforceable. We conclude that the superior court correctly applied interpretation rules by looking at the instrument language without regard to extrinsic evidence and correctly ruled that the subdivision declaration did not preclude the deed's greenbelt covenant. We therefore affirm the superior court's…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Petersen v. Mutual Life Insuarance Co. of New YorkAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
- Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Kelly v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
- Harvey v. CookAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Hagen v. StrobelAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norman Randle v. Bay Watch Condominium AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 2021