Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided March 2, 2012No. S-13858PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STOWERS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Appellant Ethel Kelly sued the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA) for negligence after she stepped into an uncovered valve box assembly pipe in a crosswalk and sustained injuries. MOA concedes that the valve box cover was missing, but denies it was responsible for this condition. MOA moved for summary judgment in the superior court on grounds that MOA had no duty to Kelly since it neither caused nor had notice of the dangerous condition; Kelly filed an opposition and cross-motion for summary judgment. The superior court granted summary Judgment to MOA.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cikan v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Rockstad v. EriksonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Gudenau & Co., Inc. v. Sweeney Ins., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Broderick v. King's Way Assembly of God ChurchAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Richardson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Christensen v. Alaska Sales & Service, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hagen v. StrobelAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Donahue v. Ledgends, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Mills v. HanklaAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API