Teynor v. Heible
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Holcomb, J., entered March 15, 1912, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for partition.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— This action was brought by the respondents against the appellants for the partition of certain real property. The land in question was acquired from the United States under the homestead laws by one Peter Teynor, who died without lineal heirs. The respondents are his father and mother. The appellant, Chloe Heible, was his wife at *223the time of his death. The other appellants claim an interest in the land through mortgages or contracts to convey executed by Chloe Heible. Peter Teynor entered the land in the year 1901. He was then a single man, never having theretofore been married.. On January…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kromer v. FridayWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Philbrick v. AndrewsWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Ahern v. AhernWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Towner v. RodegebWashington Supreme Court · 1903
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- In Re Binge's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In re the Estate of BuchananWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Hoscheid v. BartholetWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Buchser v. BuchserSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.