Legal Opinion

Hoscheid v. Bartholet

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1914No. 11412PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Kauffman, J., entered December 28, 1912, upon findings in favor of the petitioner, setting aside the final distribution of an estate.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an appeal from an order setting aside a decree of distribution of the estate of Nicholas Hoscheid, deceased, and declaring that he died intestate, and distributing his estate accordingly. The record discloses material facts as follows: On May 7, 1889, Nicholas Hoscheid, then a widower without children or other descendants, made a will, bequeathing and devising all of his property to his mother, his brothers, and other collateral kindred, and to certain relatives of his deceased wife. Thereafter, he went to Minnesota, and, on July 21, 1891, married Susanne Hoscheid, the petitioner in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. State v. McGlynn & ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Gaines v. HennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  4. State ex rel. Wood v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Greenwood v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Shattuck v. ShattuckArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In Re Elliott's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. McCullough v. McCulloughWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Ianicelli v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API