Legal Opinion

Wick v. Rea

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1909No. 7983PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered December 24, 1908, in favor of the defendants, upon the pleadings, dismissing an action to recover on covenants.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

Plaintiffs allege that, on September 24, 1906, they purchased of defendants the southeast quarter of section 24, in township 16, north, of range 4, east of Willamette Meridian, for which they paid the sum of $5,200. The deed was in form a warranty deed with full covenants. This property had been previously acquired by defendants as purchasers at a tax sale occurring in Thurston county, Washington. This action was brought to recover the value *425of a forty-acre tract, a legal subdivision of the southeast quarter as described in the deed, upon the theory that plaintiffs were not the owners thereof…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Galpin v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Wren v. Hynes' administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Peyton v. PeytonWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kizer v. CaufieldWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Thompson v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1903

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alaska Banking & Safe Deposit Co. v. NoyesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Atwood v. TuckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Double L Properties, Inc. v. CrandallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Teynor v. HeibleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Allard v. La PlainWashington Supreme Court · 1928

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API