Legal Opinion

Kromer v. Friday

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1895No. 1291PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Snohomish County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Scotf, J.

The plaintiffs have appealed from a decree of the superior court of Snohomish county dismissing their complaint, and adjudging in effect that they have no title tO' the property in controversy, which is a certain tract of land, of about 147 acres, in the present city of Everett. The complaint set up title in fee in the plaintiff, Victor E. Kromer, with subsidiary interests for a limited period in his three sisters, Emma and Mattie Kromer, who were joined as plaintiffs, and Alice Kromer, who declined to joint as plaintiff, and was made a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Pray v. . HegemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Sayward v. ThayerWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Blakeley v. . CalderNew York Court of Appeals · 1857

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Guye v. GuyeWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Leblanc v. YawnSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. LascaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Dial v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Ahern v. AhernWashington Supreme Court · 1903

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API