Legal Opinion

Aubol v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1932No. 23482. Department TwoPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Plaintiffs instituted this action in 1931 to recover for depreciation in value of their lands al leged to have resulted from the construction in 1926 of a dam and hydro-electric generating plant in Mason county by the city of Tacoma. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal rendered upon plaintiffs’ refusal to plead over, after the defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained.

The allegations of fact, admitted by the demurrer to be true, are summarized as follows and clearly show the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

In 1926, the respondent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Austin v. Augusta Terminal Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Pennsylvania R. v. MarchantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. Jacobs v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Ferry v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Taylor v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Wilkening v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Bruskland v. Oak Theater, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. Tapio Investment Co. I v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API