Legal Opinion

Pierce v. Northeast Lake Washington Sewer & Water District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 16, 1993No. 29696-5-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.

Arthur and Patricia Pierce brought an action for nuisance, trespass, negligence and inverse condemnation against defendant Northeast Lake Washington Sewer and Water District (District), based on the District's construction and maintenance of a water storage tank adjacent to their property. The trial court found that the Pierces had demonstrated no compensable damage to a property right that would entitle them to compensation, and granted summary judgment in favor of the District. The Pierces now appeal. We affirm.

*78Facts

The dispute in this case centers on the District's construction and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Touchet Valley Grain Growers, Inc. v. Opp & Seibold General Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Conger v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Phillips v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  4. Borden v. City of OlympiaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Bodin v. City of StanwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API