Legal Opinion

Bunnell v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1949No. L. A. No. 20748PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

The testamentary provisions made by Sallie H. Bunn specified that the residual estate should be “sold and given to a worthy charity selected by my executors.” In a proceeding to establish heirship, it was determined that no valid charitable trust was thereby created and distribution of the property was ordered according to the rights of succession. The appeal by the executor presents for decision only the question as to the validity of the disposition to charity.

Harry Bunn, the husband of the testatrix, lived only about one month after her death and she left no lineal heirs. Her holographic…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. In Re the Will of HillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Collier v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Carpenter v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. NC Illinois Trust Co. v. MadiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  3. NC Illinois Trust Co v. MadiganAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API