Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Schmidt

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1989No. C5-87-2401PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLEY, Justice.

The court of appeals affirmed family court orders which, after asserting jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA), 1 awarded temporary custody of the parties’ minor son to the respondent. 2 Appellant Donald Schmidt in this appeal challenges that assertion of jurisdiction; and, further, contends that the family court’s various orders awarding his wife temporary custody of their minor child were invalid because rendered ex parte without notice or opportunity to be heard and without particularized findings in contravention of Minn.Stat. §§ 518A.04,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Carson v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Matter of Welfare of MullinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Carson v. CarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Houtchens v. HoutchensSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Overfield v. CollinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Marquiss v. MarquissWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Baker v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. Swan v. SwanNevada Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API