Legal Opinion

People v. Ingram

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 26, 1978No. Crim. 29890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, Acting P. J.

The court found defendant Ingram and codefendant Evans guilty of possession of heroin. Defendant appeals from the judgment. His main contention is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to disclose identity of the informant.

On May 12 Officers Wesselink and Richardson received information from an informant regarding narcotics activity in apartment 107 at a Hollywood address—“a male Negro approximately 25 to 35 years old, five-six, five-seven, 140, and a male Negro, a drag queen,” describing him, going under the name of “Rachel,” were using and selling…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. BorundaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. BustamanteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. People v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. AlmarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Goodlow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API