People v. Ingram
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, Acting P. J.
The court found defendant Ingram and codefendant Evans guilty of possession of heroin. Defendant appeals from the judgment. His main contention is that the trial court erred in denying his motion to disclose identity of the informant.
On May 12 Officers Wesselink and Richardson received information from an informant regarding narcotics activity in apartment 107 at a Hollywood address—“a male Negro approximately 25 to 35 years old, five-six, five-seven, 140, and a male Negro, a drag queen,” describing him, going under the name of “Rachel,” were using and selling…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. RedrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Price v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. BorundaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. BustamanteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- People v. AlmarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Goodlow v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People v. AllenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.