Legal Opinion
People v. Eastman
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 17, 1993No. E010412PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DABNEY, J.
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Mark Allen Eastman of transportation of a controlled substance—in this case, methamphetamine. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd. (a).) The jury returned a verdict of not guilty on a charge of possessing the methamphetamine for sale. (§ 11378.) Appellant was placed on probation and ordered to serve 210 days in the county jail, with credit for 18 days served.
On appeal, Eastman asserts that the jury was incorrectly instructed concerning tiie meaning of the word “transportation,” as used in section 11379, in that the term must be…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- People v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- United States v. Abel Casarez-Bravo, D.C. NoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- People v. UrkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. LuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.