Ex Parte Braun
California Supreme Court
HABEAS CORPUS to test the validity of an ordinance of the City of Los Angeles, under which petitioner was convicted in the Police Court. H. C. Austin, Police Judge. Charles Elton, Chief of Police, Respondent. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELLOTTI, J.—
Petitioner was taken into custody under a warrant issued upon a complaint filed in the police court of the city of Los Angeles, charging that he, on the seventh day of April, A. D. 1903, in said city, “did willfully and unlawfully conduct, manage, and carry on the business of a wholesale liquor dealer without first having procured a license from the city of Los Angeles so to do, . . . contrary to the forms of the ordinances and resolutions adopted and approved by the municipal authorities of said city.” Having been brought before said police court under said warrant, he was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Town of Santa Monica v. GuidingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Ex Parte FrankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Vernor v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Johnson v. BradleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.