Legal Opinion

McClure v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 5, 1966No. 41859PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

The court did not err in rendering the summary judgment for the defendant under the first count. From the evidence before the trial judge it appeared that the policy of the insurance company was evidenced by a statement upon the company’s premium receipt, premium notice, or notice of expiration of policy, where there were stated the three following propositions: “Payment within ten days after due date will renew your policy and provide continuous protection.” “If payment is not made within ten days after due date, protection will be reinstated as of the date and time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bankers Health & Life Insurance v. GivvinsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Progressive Life Insurance v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  4. Davenport v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  5. Life Insurance v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. RobisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. FARMERS INSU. CO. v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Suchoski v. RedshawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  4. Sampson v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Shelly v. StraitColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API