Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. Robison

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 25, 1969No. 2 CA-CIV 641PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Several questions related to an insurance policy are presented for review, but our disposition of the coverage question renders moot the additional questions, i. e. no coverage, no damages.

In March, 1963, Carol Robison and her husband, while living in Portland, Oregon, purchased an automobile liability policy from the appellant, State Farm. The policy provided coverage for bodily injury and property damage liability, comprehensive, deductible collision, emergency road service and uninsured motorist coverage. Premiums were payable semi-annually on September 12th and March 12th…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Builders Supply Corporation v. MarshallArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. McFarland v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  3. Lievers v. National Insurance UnderwritersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  4. Nichols v. ElkinsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  5. Sahlin v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa.Arizona Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. Criterion InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  2. Employer's Administrative Services, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Equity General Insurance v. C & a Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. DeTemple v. Southern InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  5. Morey v. Educator & Executive Insurers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API