Cal-Neva Lodge, Inc. v. Marx
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
KINCAID, J., pro tem. *
Appeal by defendant from judgment for plaintiff of $7,620 and interest. The complaint is in one count alleging that defendant received from eight named individuals sums totalling $7,620, for the use and benefit of plaintiff. The answer denied each allegation and alleged one affirmative defense on information and belief that plaintiff is in bankruptcy.
The pretrial conference order incorporated an agreed statement of the parties wherein defendant admitted he did receive the claimed sums of money for the use of plaintiff. The order then stated the only remaining issue in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berka v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wise v. RadisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- Baird v. HodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- City of Los Angeles v. County of MonoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Union Oil Co. v. ChandlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Gordon v. ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- California Steel Buildings, Inc. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Thompson v. Guyer-HaysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Spence v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.