Legal Opinion
Gordon v. Reynolds
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1960No. Civ. 19046PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuniway, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment which adjudges that the court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter of the first cause of action of their second amended complaint or of the amendment thereto, which adds a third cause of action. We find that the judgment is correct.
Plaintiffs are Margaret Y. Gordon individually and Margaret Y. Gordon as administratrix of the estate of Donald B. Gordon, deceased. In her individual capacity Mrs. Gordon sues for her own personal injuries, in the second cause of action only. That cause of action was not passed upon by the trial court, and the action is still…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- The HarrisburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Just v. ChambersSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Tungus v. SkovgaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Buckeye Boiler Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- South Santa Clara Valley Water Conservation District v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Kantlehner v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- Palmer v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- De Castro v. RoweCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.