Legal Opinion

Smith v. O'Donnell

California Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11817PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

The judgment in this action in favor of the plaintiff was reversed by the District Court of Appeal of the Second Appellate District, Division Two, the opinion having been written by Mr: Justice Thompson and concurred in by his associates. Notwithstanding the reversal of the judgment, the appellant petitioned to have the action transferred to this court for a hearing herein. Due to the novelty of the questions involved, the controversy having arisen out of a collision between two airplanes, we granted appellant’s petition in order that these questions might be given further study and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. O'Connor v. MennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. O'Callaghan v. Dellwood Park Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Champagne v. A. HamBurger & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1915

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Reed v. WiserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  5. Hardin v. San Jose City Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API