Legal Opinion

Howell v. Franke

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 2013No. CV110819; A149346PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner appeals a judgment dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. The state concedes that the post-conviction court erred and that the judgment should be reversed. We agree that the post-conviction court erred and, accordingly, reverse.

Petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief and, on the same day, a motion to appoint counsel. The court did not rule on petitioner’s motion to appoint counsel. Instead, two days after the petition was filed, the court dismissed the petition as “[ffiled outside the statute of limitations.” As the state concedes, when a petitioner for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ware v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Kumar v. SchiedlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Rodacker v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Snyder v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API