Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Pendergast-Long

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 2, 1998No. 95-12710 and 95-0408M; CA A96056 and CA A96299PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

Petitioners seek reconsideration of our decision in SAIF v. Pendergast-Long, 152 Or App 780, 954 P2d 1270 (1998), in which we concluded that the Workers’ Compensation Board had jurisdiction over claimant’s request for medical services because claimant had challenged SAIF’s denial of the compensability of the underlying claim. Petitioners contend that, under the Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in SAIF v. Shipley, 326 Or 557, 955 P2d 244 (1998), the hearings division lost jurisdiction of the claim when claimant stated at hearing that her claim was for medical services under ORS 656.245. We…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. SAIF Corp. v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. SAIF Corp. v. Pendergast-LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Icenhower v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
  2. Icenhower v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API