Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Pendergast-Long

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. Agency Nos. 95-12710 and 95-0408M; CA A96056 and A96299PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.

SAIF seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant compensation for a back condition that required surgery. SAIF contends that claimant sought compensation for medical services only and, therefore, that the Hearings Division did not have jurisdiction over SAIF’s denial of that claim. We disagree with SAIF’s portrayal of the claim and, accordingly, affirm.

Claimant suffered a compensable back injury in 1986. She injured her back again in 1987 while working for the same employer. Her claims for those injuries were consolidated as a single claim under the 1986…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corporation v. ShipleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. SAIF Corp. v. Pendergast-LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API