Legal Opinion

Icenhower v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 20, 2002No. 98-10087; A110770Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 P.3d 431 (2002)

180 Or. App. 297

In the Matter of the Compensation of Lushana K. Icenhower, Claimant.

Lushana K. ICENHOWER, Petitioner,

v.

SAIF CORPORATION and S & S Sheetmetal, Inc., Respondents.

98-10087; A110770

Court of Appeals of Oregon, En Banc.

Argued and Submitted February 26, 2001.

Resubmitted January 16, 2002.

Decided March 20, 2002.

Robert F. Webber, Medford, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Black, Chapman, Webber & Stevens.

Jerome P. Larkin argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before DEITS, Chief Judge, and EDMONDS, LANDAU, HASELTON, ARMSTRONG,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. SAIF Corp. v. ShipleyOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Oliver v. Norstar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API