Legal Opinion

De Hart v. School District No. 39

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 6, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* Headnote 1. Schools and School Districts, 35 Cyc, p. 1090 (1925 Anno); 2. Statutes, 36 Cyc, p. 1151; 3. Statutes, 36 Cyc, p. 1106; 4. Evidence, 23 C.J., section 1986 (1925 Anno). On the 17th day of July, 1920, plaintiff, Jennie De Hart, a colored school teacher, was employed by the school board of defendant school district to teach the school for colored children in said district, under a contract entered into between the plaintiff and said school board, witnessing as follows:

"That the said Jennie De Hart agrees to teach the public school of said District for the term of eight months,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henry County v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Zellars v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Grimes v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Webb-Kunze Construction Co. v. Gilsonite Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  5. Gregg School Township v. HinshawIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lemasters v. WillmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. State Ex Rel. Fichtner v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  3. Fichtner v. MohrMissouri Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Heiden v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Moses v. School Dist. No. 53, Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API