Heiden v. General Motors Corp.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Judge.
Plaintiffs seek damages for fraud and deceit allegedly practiced upon them by defendant. Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ petition on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The trial court sustained that motion with leave for plaintiffs to amend within 30 days. Plaintiffs declined to amend, and the trial court thereupon entered final judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Plaintiffs appeal. We affirm.
Plaintiffs’ petition can be summarized as follows. In a prior lawsuit, plaintiffs sought damages against defendant for personal…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Perlman v. First National Bank of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- Perlman v. First Nat'l Bank of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Groves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Garrett v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Dillard v. EarnhartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. InvestmentsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Harris v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Oster v. Kribs Ford, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Parrett v. Integon Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hutson v. Uplands VillageDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.