Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Fichtner v. Haid

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 11, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Our writ of certiorari brings here for review the record of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of Wilhelmina Fichtner, Appellant, v. Charles H. Mohr, J.S. Shackelford, Henry Gnuse, D.N. Hadfield and William Zipsie, Respondents, because of an alleged conflict between the opinion of that court (16 S.W.2d 739) and a controlling decision of this court. The opinion of the Court of Appeals follows:

"This was an action commenced by the plaintiff (appellant) against the defendants to recover the loss on a deposit made by her in the Farmers Bank of Durham, Durham, Missouri, the respondents…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wahl v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  2. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Diversey v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Cable v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  5. Kritzer v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Tunget v. ShainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. BlairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  3. Bridget Rashaw v. United Consumers Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Baker v. Century Fin. Grp., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Vroom v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API