Legal Opinion

Fichtner v. Mohr

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 7, 1929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaid, P. J.

This was an action commenced by the plaintiff (appellant) against the defendants to recover the loss on a deposit made by her in the Farmers Bank of Durham, Durham, Missouri, the respondents being the directors of said bank. The petition alleged that at all times during the years 1921 and 1922, and for a long time prior thereto, said bank was wholly insolvent; that each of the defendants was well aware of the insolvent condition of said bank during all the time of its insolvency and that each of the defendants well knew during all of the years of 1921 and 1922, and for a long time prior…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Guerney v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  2. Diversey v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Cable v. McCuneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1858
  4. Kritzer v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
  5. Eads v. OrcuttMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Jones v. Pinkerton's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bridget Rashaw v. United Consumers Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Fichtner v. HaidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  4. Vroom v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. Rose v. First St. Bank of Paris, Tex.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API