Legal Opinion
Pedro v. Armour Swift-Eckrich
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 26, 2000No. 99-4103-SACPublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, Senior District Judge.
The case comes before the court on the motion of the plaintiff Lucy Pedro to review (Dk. 51) the magistrate judge’s memorandum and order filed March 23, 2000, (Dk. 49), which denied her motion to join (Dk. 38) F.R. Drake Company (“Drake”) as a defendant. The plaintiff filed her motion for review approximately thirty-two days after the magistrate judge filed his decision. The plaintiffs motion is untimely, as it was filed more than ten days after she was served with a copy of the order. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff filed this…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Steven v. Summers v. State of Utah Salt Lake Commissioners "John Does 1-5", and Salt Lake City Corporation Officer James E. FaraoneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Jefferson County School District No. R-1 v. Moody's Investor's Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Cuenca v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Elrod v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Rushing v. Ambest, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Jefferies v. United Rotary Brush Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
- Aiken v. Assurance Health Shawnee, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2024
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.