Kossman v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
FLAHERTY, Judge.
Paul Kossman (Kossman) petitions for review of an order from the Public Utility Commission (Commission) dismissing his exceptions and adopting the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) which concluded that Kossman is not entitled to a refund of the “contributions-in-aid-of-con-struetion” (CIAC) that Duquesne Light Company (Duquesne) charged Kossman for service line extensions to his commercial developments and that Duquesne properly charged Kossman an “income tax gross-up,” calculated pursuant to the relevant regulations promulgated by the Commission, Du-quesne’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Elkin v. Bell Tel. Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- WESTON v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Brockway Glass Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Ridley Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- D.J. Norman v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- J. Kline v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2026
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.