Holmes v. General Dynamics Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WIENER, J.
In October 1984 defendant General Dynamics (GD) terminated plaintiff Randall Holmes, a 13-year management employee. Finding GD fired Holmes in violation of public policy by retaliating against him for disclosing to management the company’s violation of the false statements act (18 U.S.C. § 1001), 1 a jury determined Holmes was entitled to $106,000 for lost wages and benefits, $200,000 for emotional distress and $500,000 in punitive damages. 2 GD appeals, asserting the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment and instructional error. 3 Holmes cross-appeals, contending…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Truck Ins. Exchange v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Rodriguez v. Nam Min ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ferrick v. Santa Clara UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.