Legal Opinion

Holmes v. General Dynamics Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 18, 1993No. Docket Nos. D012414, D012839PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J.

In October 1984 defendant General Dynamics (GD) terminated plaintiff Randall Holmes, a 13-year management employee. Finding GD fired Holmes in violation of public policy by retaliating against him for disclosing to management the company’s violation of the false statements act (18 U.S.C. § 1001), 1 a jury determined Holmes was entitled to $106,000 for lost wages and benefits, $200,000 for emotional distress and $500,000 in punitive damages. 2 GD appeals, asserting the evidence was insufficient to support the judgment and instructional error. 3 Holmes cross-appeals, contending…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Gantt v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Truck Ins. Exchange v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Rodriguez v. Nam Min ChoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Ferrick v. Santa Clara UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API