Legal Opinion

Mannon v. Pesula

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1943No. Civ. 12411PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Charles M. Mannon brought this action in interpleader to determine conflicting claims to the sum • of $1,975.31, the proceeds from the sale by Mannon of certain sawmill machinery and equipment. The conflicting claimants, each of whom filed cross-complaints, are Yorkville Lumber Company, Ltd., in whose favor the trial court found, and H. B. Hickey and Allan Standish, the appellants. Hickey has since died and his executors have been substituted. Others were named as defendants but were either never served or have defaulted.

The facts are as follows: In 1932 C. J. Pesula and N. P. Burgess entered…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hurley v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Red Bud Realty Co. v. SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  3. Wagner v. SariottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Pacific Ready Cut Homes, Inc. v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Remillard Brick Co. v. Remillard-Dandini Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. Vars, Pave, McCord & FreedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
  4. Holder v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API