Legal Opinion
Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 30, 1946No. Civil Action 129PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BELL, District Judge.
The Case.
The Northern Pacific Railway Company commenced this suit against the United States under the act of Congress of March 3, 1887, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), commonly known as the Tucker Act, to recover a balance claimed due for freight charges on shipments of cement from six points in the state of . Washington to Odair, Washington. This action is brought by the Northern Pacific Railway Company as a delivering carrier. The Great Northern Railway Company and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Company as connecting carriers are interested parties, although…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Insurance Co. v. BoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. MorseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- United States v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
- United States v. American Precision Products Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1953
- First National Bank of Malden v. Farmers New World Life Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.