State v. Solum
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after having been found guilty in bastardy proceedings.
The girl testified that sexual intercourse took place in a store on January 3, 1929. Two other persons testified as to the opportunity at that time and place. Defendant’s mother testified that he had told her that he had had such intercourse with the girl. The entire record is convincing of defendant’s guilt. He did not take the stand.
In the preliminary portion of the court’s instructions, wherein it was apparently attempting to simplify and make plain the issues, it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- Eichhorn v. LundinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State v. DamuthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. FarmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. KaufmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BillingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Thelen v. SpilmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957