State v. Damuth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury, jointly with three others, for the crime of mayhem, tried in the district court for Meeker county, and upon his demand was granted a separate trial before Daly, J., and a jury which .returned a verdict of guilty of assault in the second degree. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendant was indicted with three others, charged with the crime of mayhem. His separate trial in the district court of Meeker county resulted in a verdict of guilty of an assault in the -second degree. From the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.. On the evening of February 18,1916, defendant assaulted Frank Nagel and struck him several blows, seriously injuring Nagel and destroying his right eye. The assault was made without a weapon, the injury to the eye being the result of a blow from defendant’s naked fist.
Two principal contentions are made by appellant: (1)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- State v. RonkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. CorrivauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- State v. TowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Traxler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1952
- State v. FleckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- State v. GaularppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. BowersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.