Legal Opinion

Eichhorn v. Lundin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 18, 1927No. 26,291PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

Defendants appealed from an order denying their alternative motion for judgment non obstante or a new trial. The action is for injuries arising out of a collision between plaintiff’s auto and defendants’ truck.

Belgrade avenue runs through North Mankato from the west making a turn to the southeast at an angle of about 60 degrees. To the point of turning it is 40 feet wide, thereafter wider. Just before the turn, Cedar street runs into it from the north. River street is located at substantially where the avenue would have been had it continued east instead of making the turn.

We state the facts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. Aubin v. Duluth Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  3. Anderson v. Oregon RailroadOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Rowan & Co. v. HullWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Klare v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Olson v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Hanson v. SchrickOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Mechler v. McMahonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Guthrie v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  5. State v. GardenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API