State v. Kaufman
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after he was found guilty of the crime of larceny.
The information upon which he was prosecuted charged him and another man with having stolen “from * * * the Royal Clothing House' Company, a corporation duly organized, * * * under * * * the laws of the state of Minnesota, situated at No. 203 Minnesota avenue, in said village,” a quantity of men’s clothing of the value of more than $25, and alleged that the property was stolen in the nighttime and belonged to the company.
At the opening of the trial appellant’s counsel…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- State v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- State v. SolumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.