Legal Opinion

State v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 8, 1927No. 26,164PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

Defendant appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial after he was found guilty of the crime of larceny.

The information upon which he was prosecuted charged him and another man with having stolen “from * * * the Royal Clothing House' Company, a corporation duly organized, * * * under * * * the laws of the state of Minnesota, situated at No. 203 Minnesota avenue, in said village,” a quantity of men’s clothing of the value of more than $25, and alleged that the property was stolen in the nighttime and belonged to the company.

At the opening of the trial appellant’s counsel…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steinbauer v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  2. State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  3. State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. State ex rel. Petcoff v. ReedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  5. State v. DunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. MedinaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. State v. ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 1978
  3. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. State v. SolumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API