CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. York
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The plaintiff, Joseph F. York, a practicing physician, filed an action against the defendant, Continental Casualty Company, alleging that he had been issued a policy of insurance by the defendant providing for a monthly indemnity for injuries received by accidental means. The plaintiff contended that due to an accidental injury he was entitled to monthly indemnity benefits as provided in the policy. The defendant in its answer denied the plaintiff suffered accidental injury which resulted in his disability, and further allege that he has not been confined to his house and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ozark Mutual Life Ass'n v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Corsaut v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Rushing v. Travelers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- C. I. T. Financial Services, Inc. v. McDermittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Price v. State ex rel. State Employees Group Health, Dental & Life Insurance BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988