Price v. State ex rel. State Employees Group Health, Dental & Life Insurance Board
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ALMA WILSON, Justice:
The sole issue before this Court is whether appellee, who voluntarily terminated her employment with the State, is entitled to health insurance benefits under the extended benefits provision of the State Employees Group Insurance. We answer in the affirmative.
The facts are not in dispute. On May 17, 1982, appellee and her minor son [hereinafter Son] were insured with the State Employees Group Insurance when Son was hospitalized for accidental injuries to his pelvis and legs. As a result of the injuries, Son sustained major medical problems requiring extensive surgeries.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ozark Mutual Life Ass'n v. WinchesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RazzookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co. v. SpringstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kaufman v. Provident Life & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992