Legal Opinion
Rushing v. Travelers Insurance
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 9, 1955No. Civ. No. 3669PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, District Judge.
The plaintiff, W. F. Rushing, an Oklahoma citizen, brings this action against the defendant, The Travelers Insurance Company of Hartford, Connecticut, a Connecticut corporation, to recover proceeds allegedly due plaintiff as an insured under a group life policy issued by the defendant (herein referred to as “Travelers”).1 The sole issue is whether, as provided in the policy, the plaintiff has become “wholly disabled by bodily injuries” so as to be prevented “from engaging in any occupation or employment for wage or profit.” 2
In 1949 the plaintiff, while working as a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Great Southern Life Ins. Co. v. JohnsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Hefner v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
- Mut. L. Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. Bryant.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert C. Roe v. General American Life Insurance Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. FisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. YorkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965