Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 28, 1962No. 39677PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
In the trial court, plaintiff Thomas F. Fisher sued defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company for total and permanent disability benefits allegedly accruing under an insurance policy issued by the defendant company.
He based his claim upon the first paragraph of Section 1(b) of the policy, which provides as follows:
“Total and Permanent Disability Benefits — Upon receipt by the Company of due notice and proof — in writing — that any Employee, while insured hereunder * * * has become totally and permanently disabled, as a result of bodily injury or disease, so as to be…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Maze v. Equitable Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Continental Casualty Co. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- New York Life Ins. Co. v. RazzookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robert C. Roe v. General American Life Insurance Co. And Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- Williams Petroleum Company, a Partnership Composed of William H. Clement and H. C. Preston, Jr. v. Midland Cooperatives, Incorporated, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- National Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Altus Flying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Studebaker v. CohenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Shepherd v. FrenchCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.